Tuesday, January 26, 2016
CONSTABLE FORCILLO GUILTY OF ATTEMPTED MURDER
Today's Waterloo Region Record carrys this story titled "Toronto Officer Guilty of Attempted Murder". Well I expect there are at least a few sighs of relief that the public, blatant lifetaking of Sammy Yatin has been recognized. That said there does seem to be some sort of comprimise going on in this case. Sammy was shot three times by Constable Forcillo, collapsed and then shot at six more times. A total of eight of nine bullets fired struck Sammy Yatin, killing him. Then just for good measure as well as for show I would expect, another officer tasered the downed and dying or dead Sammy yatin. What a disgusting disgrace of police work.
Constable Forcillo's defence was that he was behaving according to his police training. Dear God but I hope the man is a liar because if that actually is how the police force trains their recruits then we as citizens in an allegedly democratic country are in big trouble. That is how I would expect police officers to be trained in a dictatorship but not here. Also of interest is the suggestion that Constable Forcillo is not guilty of murder because allegedly the first three shots were O.K. for him to fire and they are the ones that supposedly took Sammy's life. The next six shots got the officer convicted of attempted murder only as Sammy was already allegedly dead. Besides that somewhat bizarre logic is how exactly do they know which bullets of the eight fired did the lethal damage? Were there some shots more lethal than others? Are the bullets numbered for easy identification so pathologists know whether bullet one, two or eight did the deed? That of course is ridiculous as I suspect many will find this conviction to be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Clearly was murder shooting if you watch you tube video he was being attacked or his life was in danger a tazer was at the scene but instead he dhoots him 3 times cause he eouldnt drop the nife then unloafs his gun into a laying dying helpless Canadain thats murder clearly and clearly why police say they dont want cameras videoing there work anymore we need not wonder why now but we do have the right to video anyone in public property especially our public servants our canadain rights are not eqaul rights I read other storeys on advocate and read about Crawford Lamka whos father recently wrote the advocate in responce to clarify it wasnt over any debt his son shot each masked armed home invader once in self defence cause his sons life was being threatened by armed masked home invaders tryn to rob or kill him he only shot each robber one in self defence n got 4 years for murder in what was a clear case of self defence and his life was being threatened this officer emptied his gun into a dying liying or in his exscuse was akready dead but clearly on you tube his life wasnt being threatened before or even after the first three shots emptying a gun into a dying man is clearly murder I hope he gets 4 years too cause he clearly intented to kill a helpless canadain who was of no threat before or after the first three shots not allowed to video tape our public servants at work being police want no evidence from public the law that was made up to protect police when they are being exssesive I tell you every canadain has a right to video anyone in public and our servants doing there job too and if my lifes being threatened and its a kill or be killed id shoot in self defence too same as police and states can weres our eqaul right when a police officer can shoot n kill but a Canadian citizen has to die instead of fight to live hog wash our rights need to be rewrote so a American or terrist comes armed or home invader we have the right yo self defence not die with no choice
ReplyDelete