Alan MARSHALL2
Yahoo
/
Inbox
JUS-G-MAG-Kitchener Jury (MAG)
To:
Alan Marshall
Apr. 29 at 4:32 p.m.
Good afternoon,
Your request to be deferred from attending the jury selection panel on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 has been granted. You are no longer required to attend on that date. You may be summoned for a later panel. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Cathy Sterling – Jury Clerk
Ministry of the Attorney General | Superior Court of Justice
Waterloo Region Courthouse | 85 Frederick Street, Kitchener, ON N2H 0A7
T: (519) 741-3300 ext. 3279 | F: (519) 741-3278
E: kitchenerjury@ontario.ca
For more information about jury duty in Ontario, please visit the
“Jury Duty” section on the Ministry of the Attorney General website:
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/courts/jury/
From: Alan Marshall [mailto:agmarshall@rogers.com]
Sent: April-05-19 11:56 AM
To: JUS-G-MAG-Kitchener Jury (MAG)
Subject: My Jury Summons
Dear Ms. Hughes
My name is Alan Marshall and I am a retired pensioner in my seventieth year. While I am competent to drive, since I've been retired I am intelligent enough not to drive during rush hours, if at all possible. Part of the reason is that my wife survived a very serious accident during rush hour on the K-W Expressway a couple of years ago. I live in Elmira, Ontario which also fortunately does not really have much of a rush hour. My personal mobility is negatively affected by arthritis including having received one artificial joint. The second one is likely due within the year. This is the second time in recent years that I have received a jury summons. The last time I attended court for this matter I was treated rudely and dismissively by the dishonourable Robert Reilly. Mr. Reilly recognized me from a civil case that is more than twenty years old and made inferences and subtle comments to the defence and prosecution suggesting that I was not juror material. I was not impressed by that.
I am not carte blanche suggesting that I am incapable of doing my civic duty and potentially being a juror in a trial. What I am strongly suggesting however is that I do not need either my time nor my health and wellness negatively impacted by attending another jury summons in which Mr. Reilly is in charge. I was a self represented litigant (SRL) twenty years ago and his behaviour was outrageous and unethical and the decision he came to was shameful. If I had any money at the time I would have appealed it. As I was a SRL however he knew I could not afford to appeal. With the assistance from a lawyer working pro bono we were able over a period of five years to reduce a libel award from the second highest in Canadian history (after the Church of Scientology ? case) down to zero. Yes zero from Mr. Reilly's award of $604,000. The new settlement was filed with Superior Court in 2004.
Therefore Ms. Hughes I would ask you to please advise me in writing (or e-mail) significantly prior to my attending court on May 21/19 at 9 am. in the morning that I will not be wasting my time nor putting myself at physical risk only to be disrespected yet again by Mr. Reilly.
Thank you very much in advance for your consideration and understanding.
Sincerely Alan Marshall
Juror No. 4592 Panel No. 12
Robert sounds like a ass hole n a stupid judge to make comments of predjuduce nature that would show the judge is stupid ,incompetent ,and the judges comments could have resulted in a mistrial.Crooked judges who like to stack the jury in their favor kinda reminds me of the outwest trial of a all white jury finding a white man innocent of murder after shooting a native trespasser last year I'm the back of the head dead.Or the other crooked judge in hamilton said Knill was innocent of murder of Styres a native from 6th nations who waz shot out side knill house for tryn to steel knill truck .Knill said he feared for his life But he went outside with a loaded shotgun n shot the poor defenses native 2 times point blank.and in Baden a crooked judge and courts told Mr Lamka he waz guilty of murder for defending his life and father's in his own home he shot a 3 home invaders point blank and one died jarsh Henry. Clearly lamkas case was self defence and in his home but lamka got 4 years.. while 2 other canadain who shot defenseless people outside there home got off found innocent by a crooked judge obviously....No equal rights by judges in canada.so I would say afraid of judges but more afraid getting screwed over by crooked judges in Canada.States well they know the Rodney King storey aswell as the black girl that got shot for apperntly tryn to sell orange juice ..all white jurors..I guess states and Canada have 1 thing in common they like hiring crooked judges with predjuduce attitudes.So yes I'd Not do jury duty either they dont want honest people on a jury anyways be total waste time.
ReplyDelete