This Blog will discuss politics, government, corruption, police, S.I.U., courts, education, min. of attorney general, min. of labour, v.o.i.c.e. and other current and past events of interest to concerned citizens. In the "About me" section to the right and down I have included the names of persons whom I have tremendous respect for. Their influence on me however has been primarily environmental (and personal) and this is therefore a disclaimer that all words posted on this Blog/Website are mine and I alone am responsible for them. I say this with the greatest respect and affection to my friends.

Monday, March 16, 2015

JUSTICE OR VENGEANCE - BOURDEAU MURDER CASE



And that is the rub! What murder case? Quoting from Saturday's Waterloo Region Record "A key to the case was the inabilty of a pathologist - due to decomposition and other damage to the body - to determine a cause of death or find evidence of definite injuries consistent with a violent attack.". Therefore there was absolutely no way to know if the dead woman had drowned by accident or committed suicide. Both she and the accused had been drinking that night and were alcoholics. Yes he had a horrible reputation including evidence of being violent with the dead woman. However criminal cases are not supposed to be about being on the balance of probablilites as civil cases are. They are supposed to be decided on gulity beyond a reasonable doubt. "Reasonable doubt" - The Crown couldn't even prove on any basis whatsoever that a crime had been committed. Murder - what murder? Therefore how is it possible to convict a person of a crime, beyond a reasonable doubt - when you can't even prove that a crime was committed in the first place? This is Kafkaesque and Orwellian. This is not what are Justice system is supposed to be.

No comments:

Post a Comment